>>18777
Thanks for getting back to me. It's good to know that the work was largely sound.
[55/147 (55.png)]
This one was really hard, and I spent a lot of time on it. Looks like I'm not done yet.
I'm hesitant to add a phrase like "shouldn't look into," because of how dramatically that diverges from the original. The main purpose of the phrase is to state that Takase feels like she's come into contact with something in Reo that she wouldn't have expected given how perfect she though Reo was, not that there's something in Reo that she needs to necessarily avoid. If 触れる is to be more mental than physical, I would suggest something like:
> 彼女ã®æ™®é€šã˜ã‚ƒãªã„部分
> I'm getting the feeling I've witnessed/glimpsed/felt
> 深淵ã¿ãŸã„ãªã‚‚ã®ã«è§¦ã‚Œã¦ã—ã¾ã£ãŸæ°—ãŒã—ã¦ã„ã‚‹
> A part of her that's not normal
> A thing like a deep abyss
The 深淵ã¿ã‚“ãŸã„ãªã‚‚ã® is the thing that Takase is sensing (触れる); the way I parse it, this is the same thing as 彼女ã®æ™®é€šã˜ã‚ƒãªã„部分. The second phrase (深淵ã¿ãŸã„ãªã‚‚ã®) is intended to further describe 彼女ã®æ™®é€šã˜ã‚ƒãªã„部分. I tried to preserve the structure— saying there's a thing inside her, then describing it more vividly— and then put the statement that Takase is sensing it at the front to create a reasonable line break, as demanded by the text layout. Is my parsing way off? It's hard for me to see it any other way.
[85/147 (85.png)]
To be perfectly honest, I'm kind of in love with the line "my desire was manifest," and it's hard for me to see it as stilted. "Manifest" is not an uncommon word, and I don't believe that this is an uncommon usage of it: Merriam-Webster provides several examples of the word being used in this way ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manifest ). So I would really like to retain it, but if you think that it doesn't fit, here's a statement that I feel is similarly stark (in keeping with the original) and less likely to cause confusion:
> 責任を感ã˜ã¦æ³£ã崩れる礼央ã•ã‚“を見ã¦æ¬²ãŒå‡ºãŸ
> I saw Reo-san, feeling responsible, broken down crying, and I wanted her.
[108/147 (108.png)]
I agree, the phrasing here was odd. Try this:
> ãã‚“ãªå‹ã ã¡ã«å¯¾ã™ã‚‹å„ªã—ã•ãªã‚‰æ¬²ã—ããªã„
> I don't want the kindness she gives to her friends.
On page 54:
> 誰ã«ã§ã‚‚ã‚„ã•ã—ãã¦ã•ã°ã•ã°ã—ã¦ã¦
> Was candid and kind to everyone
[115/147 (115.png)]
I still maintain that "flat" is an acceptable word here, and is not less abstract than the original. In English, the word "flat" is often used to indicate that something is uninteresting or lacking verve ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flat definition 7a, 7b, 7c ). In this sense, the usage is similar to "vanilla." Additionally, the term in the original isn't 普通 or ã¤ã¾ã‚‰ãªã„ or 平凡, but å¹³å¦. To the best of my knowledge, this word indicates not an emotional, but a physical flatness. As far as I know, there are words for emotional flatness or monotony, but å¹³å¦ is not one of them.
This phrase follows directly from Reo's comments about the æµ®ã沈㿠she experienced with Meiko: this translates rather literally (and appropriately, mercifully enough) as "highs and lows." Now that there aren't as many highs and lows, things are flat. Physically flat. As I read it, I don't think this analogy is more tortured in English than it was in the original, and I don't think that a reader of the English text will have to work harder to understand it than a reader of the original Japanese. Because of this, I hold that the use of "flat" is justified.
Unless I'm missing something. Am I?
[133/147 (133.png)]
I, too, learned only today that a chapter had been released. Oh well.
For the record, I don't know if it's just regional or something, but "handsomer" sounds far more natural to me than "more handsome," which in turn sounds wrong to me. Merriam-Webster backs me up on this one ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/handsome ), but apparently both forms are in contemporary use.
Also, it's not a big enough change to worry about, but I'm just curious: why the flip from "...than a girl has any right to be" to "...than any girl has a right to be"?
I hope this makes sense. Thanks again for putting in the work to make it readable; hopefully next time, it won't take as much revision.